|
| |
Arlington - It’s A Matter of Interpretation?
- by Bruce Milton
No, I hadn’t been drinking – although my
eyesight could have been attributable to the bacchanalian orgies much described
in my previous years digging at Barcombe! It was more in common with those weird
3D pictures that were all the rage some years ago – you know the ones where you
had to vacantly stare at a spot in the image and hey presto (if you were blank
enough) you would see a faint grey shape suddenly emerge from the background.
Perhaps I have the gift to stare blankly at any time of the day, whether I am at
work, at home listening to the wife and/or kids or even staring at a bit of
flint, but these 3D images seem to work for me more often than not even if I
don’t necessarily see the correct image that emerges from the picture.
But hey, you are probably staring blankly at
these words wondering what on earth I’m talking about; let me explain. I was
manipulating and studying the results of some resistivity work that was
undertaken by MSFAT & BHAS members in a field near Arlington on weekend of 22nd/23rd
March and trying to decipher the data in front of me when suddenly features
seemed to jump out at me. Alarmed by this unique insight I asked my wife to
come and have a look at the size of the irises in my eyes in case I was ‘on’
something and to confirm that she could see the same things I could see. Bless
her, I wasn’t; she could; and even pointed to one or two more features which
seemed to complete the picture. Read on; more on our vision later.
We were alerted to this field by a metal
detector club via Sid Jeffrey who confirmed that a lot of material (mainly
Roman) had been found scattered on the ground; but was concentrated around a
level platform within the sloping field, close to a stream and within a short
distance of a Roman road – reminiscent of our site at Barcombe but facing north
and without such a great view. This was worth an investigation. We surveyed the
site using our trusty RM15 resistance data logger and initially covered 5x5 20m
grids using the zigzag transverse method with a sample interval of 1m. (you’re
not staring blankly are you?) The data was downloaded on David Stavely’s laptop
and processed on site. It was then decided to survey 2 more grids – to make sure
we had captured all the possible features within the site. David then e-mailed
me the results to further process a couple of days later.
I suppose now I’d better get to the point,
having filtered, de-spiked and smoothed out the data, some features immediately
stood out. These dark features shown on the untouched plot denote high
resistance, and can be seen running from the west of the site and turning a 90
degree angle at the east of the site. Further high resistance readings and
concentrations can also be seen which could possibly denote walls and buildings.
A circular feature in the south-eastern corner could show a possible roundhouse
– it seems to be the correct size. There also appears to be some low resistance
areas within the plot, particularly the ‘lollipop’in the south-western corner
and the square platform in the eastern side. Don’t ask me to speculate on what
they are. The features that ‘popped’ out at me included more roundhouses,
circular ditches and even a large enclosure ditch running north/south at the
eastern edge. I must stress (and no doubt you will assume that this is all part
of my usual ramblings and weird outlook on life) that these features only appear
clearly on the monitor. No matter how hard I try I cannot transfer the features
clearly on the printed copies - so you just have to take my (and my wife’s) word
for what we saw.

Fig. 2: The results of the Resistivity
Survey at Arlington
So there you go, evaluating resistance data
not only depends on what you see clearly before you, it can also depend on your
interpretive abilities. This data can give you clues and, possibly, red herrings
of what lies beneath, but the only way to find out for sure is to excavate, at
least the resistivity can indicate to you where to dig. I’m off to have another
delve, why don’t you have a go. First look at the image yourself and then start
staring, staring, staring, perhaps you may see the features I can see, or
perhaps you can see something different.
|